Found some slop?

Drop the link. We might cover it tomorrow. Or email slop@dailyslopshow.com.

· Episode 14 · 6 min

A Ring, A Lawsuit, And A Coin That Doesn't Need Firmware

Two links on the shelf this morning, so we made them count. A class action accuses a sleep-tracking ring's AI insights of being a coin flip — an allegation, not a finding — and a very modest paper about named entity recognition arrived at our door described as five things it isn't. Plus a free experiment you can run on any app that grades you.

A Ring, A Lawsuit, And A Coin That Doesn't Need FirmwareListen on Apple Podcasts

In this edition

  1. 0:07 Two Links And A Shrug
  2. 0:31 The Coin Flip You Wear To Bed
  3. 2:23 The Least Marketable Sentence In AI
  4. 4:34 Something Useful
  5. 5:40 Nothing Promised

In this edition

The Coin Flip You Wear To Bed

Oura Ring faces class-action lawsuit over ‘Coin Flip’ AI sleep-tracking claims - fox10tv.com Abby frames first, warmly — what the thing actually is and why people love it. Boyd comes in on the business model, not the science. Land on the specific: you pay every month for a score you cannot audit. The genuine disagreement is whether a number that motivates you is worthless if it is wrong; Abby says no, Boyd says the coin is cheaper. Hard limits: this is an allegation in a filed lawsuit, not a finding, and no verdict exists — say so twice. Nobody gives sleep advice, nobody discusses anyone's health, and we do not claim the device harms anyone. It is a story about claims and subscriptions, and it stays there.

AI scams, fraud and courtrooms

The Least Marketable Sentence In AI

Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition with Cross-Lingual, Character-Level Neural Conditional Random Fields Boyd frames first, because for once he has nothing to be cold about: the title is a fact, not a promise. Abby takes the human end — most of the world's languages, no annotation, someone doing the unglamorous work anyway. Then the turn: read out the five things this paper was claimed to be before we opened it, deadpan, in a list. That is the recursion and it should be played straight, not explained. Do not pretend we have read the results or know how well the method performs; we have the abstract and the title, and the point is the contrast between that modesty and everything else in the episode. No mock-outrage about the mislabelling — it is funnier as a shrug.

arXiv cs.CL

Something Useful

Oura Ring faces class-action lawsuit over ‘Coin Flip’ AI sleep-tracking claims - fox10tv.com Abby pitches it as genuinely empowering, because it is: it costs nothing and requires no technical skill. Boyd supplies the catch and refuses to let her call it science — a sample of one person over two weeks is a hobby, not a study. Keep it to apps and scores. No health framing, no suggestion anyone should act on what they find, no implication that a bad score means anything at all.

AI scams, fraud and courtrooms

Transcript

0:07 Two Links And A Shrug

AbbyWelcome to The Daily Slop Show.

Boyd[snappy] Where nothing we say becomes the truth.

Abby[excited] And today the shelf had two things on it. Two! One lawsuit, one research paper—

Boyd[jumping in] —and the paper turned up described five different ways, [statement] none of which were the paper.

Abby[laughs] Which I think is charming. [thoughtful] Small day. Honest show.

Boyd[snappy] It's the whole episode. [short pause] Start with the ring.

0:31 The Coin Flip You Wear To Bed

Abby[excited] Okay. There is a ring — a ring, on your finger, you sleep in it — and this morning it is being sued. Fox Ten TV, via Google News: [statement] "Oura Ring faces class-action lawsuit over 'Coin Flip' AI sleep-tracking claims." That is a filed class action. An allegation. Nobody has found anything.

Boyd[snappy] And "coin flip" is their phrase. It's in the headline. Not ours.

AbbyTheir phrase. [thoughtful] And I want to defend the ring, Boyd—

Boyd[jumping in] —of course you do.

Abby[statement] Because it's a lovely object, and people genuinely change their habits around a number in the morning.

Boyd[snappy] Around a number. Not around a correct number.

Abby[loud] Does that matter, though? If it moves you—

Boyd[cut in] Yes. Because—

AbbyBecause the—

Boyd[short pause] Sorry. Go on.

AbbyNo, you. You had it.

Boyd[snappy] Because what's being alleged here is that you're paying, on a schedule, for a grade on a night you were unconscious for. [short pause] And you have no way to mark it. [sarcastic] A coin is free. A coin never asks you to update the firmware.

Abby[thoughtful] Hmm. A placebo that works still works, though.

Boyd[long pause] AI-powered sleep wellness insights. [statement] Four words, one lawsuit.

Abby[sigh] Okay. Yeah. When you stack it like that it does sound like a horoscope with a battery.

Boyd[snappy] Right. And to say it twice, because it matters: [statement] this is a claim in a lawsuit. There is no verdict. Nobody has proved anything about anybody's sleep.

Abby[statement] Filed, not found. Moving on.

2:23 The Least Marketable Sentence In AI

Boyd[snappy] Second story, and for once I have nothing to be cold about. arXiv, paper twenty-four-oh-four-oh-nine-three-eight-three, version two. Title: "Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition with Cross-Lingual, Character-Level Neural Conditional Random Fields."

Abby[disbelief] That's it? No "changes everything"?

Boyd[statement] Not one adjective. The abstract says low-resource named entity recognition — teaching software to spot names in text — is still an open problem, [snappy] and that most state-of-the-art systems need tens of thousands of annotated sentences to work well.

Abby[cut in] And for most of the world's languages nobody has that—

Boyd[jumping in] —the abstract's word is unfeasible. So they train character-level models jointly, high-resource and low-resource languages together, and hope the shapes of the words carry across.

Abby[thoughtful] I love this, actually. Somebody sat down to make text tools work for languages that are never going to get a big annotated dataset, and their reward is — [short pause] what, the version number?

Boyd[snappy] Announce type: replace. It's a twenty twenty-four preprint, quietly re-announced. [short pause] And we've read the title and the abstract. We have not read the results, we don't know how well it performs, and we're not pretending otherwise.

Abby[excited] Now tell them how it reached us.

Boyd[statement] This one paper arrived attached to five different descriptions. Markets of haggling AI agents. Reddit mood swings. A creativity study. An SQLite trick. [short pause] A punch-card Turing machine.

Abby[laughs] The slop-sorting pipeline generated slop. About a paper on sorting text.

Boyd[snappy] Yeah. [short pause] The one modest thing in the building, and we mislabelled it five times.

4:34 Something Useful

Abby[excited] Something Useful! And this one's free. Take the plaintiffs' word — coin flip — and run it yourself. Before you open any app that scores you, sleep, focus, steps, whatever, [statement] write down your own guess first. Then look.

Boyd[snappy] Two weeks of that and you'll know whether the app is telling you anything you didn't already know.

Abby[excited] Right? Costs nothing, no technical skill, it's basically sci—

Boyd[jumping in] —not science. [statement] One person, two weeks, is a hobby.

Abby[sigh] Fine. A hobby. [thoughtful] But here's the catch, and you should say it, because you'll enjoy it more.

Boyd[snappy] Most of you will find the app agrees with you. [short pause] Which proves nothing. [sarcastic] Agreeing with you is exactly what a well-tuned guess and a well-tuned flatterer both do.

Abby[laughs] So the score is either useless or a compliment.

Boyd[statement] And either way, it's a number about an app. Not about you.

5:40 Nothing Promised

Abby[thoughtful] No tease today. Everything we've got is either already in this episode or isn't real enough to stand behind yet.

Boyd[snappy] So we're not selling you a story we can't see.

AbbyWe're The Daily Slop Show.

Boyd[snappy] None of this becomes true just because we said it. See you tomorrow.